In Union County, South Carolina, the once-thriving cotton mills that provided livelihoods for many have long disappeared. The county is now classified as a “food desert,” meaning that many of its residents live far from the nearest grocery store. Recognizing this issue, local non-profit leader Elise Ashby took action in 2016, collaborating with farmers to distribute discounted boxes of fresh produce throughout the county, where approximately 30% of the population is Black and around 25% live in poverty.
At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”
“It brought me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”
A mere two years ago, initiatives like this received extensive support from large companies throughout the U.S., as the nation confronted systemic racism following the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black man who lost his life beneath the knee of a Minneapolis police officer.
However, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these commitments. In November, Walmart shared plans to end certain diversity efforts, with the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in financing Ms. Ashby’s grant, among them.
Firms like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have undertaken comparable actions, highlighting a more extensive corporate retraction from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.
This shift marks a notable cultural change, driven in part by fears of legal challenges, regulatory scrutiny, and social media backlash—pressures exacerbated by the new U.S. president.
Since taking office in January, Donald Trump has actively sought to dismantle DEI programs, pushing for a shift back to “merit-based opportunity” in the U.S. He has directed the federal government to eliminate DEI initiatives and begin investigations into private companies and academic institutions suspected of “illegal DEI practices.”
During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put nearly 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump ousted the nation’s top military general—a Black individual—after the defense secretary had earlier recommended his removal because of his connection to “woke” DEI strategies.
At first sight, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to better outcomes for racial and identity groups historically marginalized. However, some specialists propose that these efforts might continue, perhaps under alternative names that better align with the evolving political environment of a country that has recently elected a leader devoted to opposing “woke” policies.
The Roots of the Backlash
DEI-style programs first gained momentum in the U.S. during the 1960s in response to the civil rights movement, which sought to expand and protect the rights of Black Americans.
Originally described through terms like “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these programs sought to address the enduring impacts of slavery and the institutional discrimination enforced under Jim Crow laws.
As social justice movements evolved to encompass women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the terminology surrounding these efforts broadened to include “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”
In the realm of corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment practices, portraying diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents claim that these programs tackle inequities across different communities, even though the focus has traditionally been on racial equity.
The drive for DEI gained momentum in 2020 during the Black Lives Matter demonstrations and rising calls for societal reform. For example, Walmart committed $100 million over five years to create its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo named its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already maintained analogous leadership positions. After these developments, S&P 100 companies generated more than 300,000 new jobs, with 94% allocated to people of color, based on Bloomberg’s findings.
Nonetheless, as swiftly as these initiatives grew, a conservative pushback arose.
Stefan Padfield, executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, argues that DEI programs fundamentally divide people along racial and gender lines.
In recent times, critics have amplified claims that DEI efforts—initially intended to fight discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Training workshops that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.
This opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic approach proposing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Over time, movements opposing CRT in educational settings transformed into broader endeavors to punish “woke corporations.”
Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative figures such as Robby Starbuck have capitalized on this sentiment, targeting companies for their DEI initiatives. Starbuck has claimed responsibility for policy shifts at companies like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after exposing their DEI programs to his online followers.
One of the most visible victories for this movement came in spring 2023, when Bud Light faced widespread backlash for partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Calls to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, resulted in a 28% decline in Bud Light sales, according to a Harvard Business Review analysis.
Another major turning point arrived in June 2023, when the Supreme Court ruled that race could no longer be a factor in university admissions, effectively dismantling decades of affirmative action policies.
This decision raised questions about the legal foundation of corporate DEI policies. After the ruling, Meta advised employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the termination of its own DEI programs.
Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity
The rapid rollback of DEI initiatives among major corporations raises questions about the sincerity of their commitments to workforce diversity.
Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many companies initially embraced DEI efforts to “look good” in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than out of genuine commitment to change.
Nonetheless, not every company is succumbing to political and legal pressure. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation remarked that although DEI programs seem to be waning, “nearly all” Fortune 500 companies still incorporate DEI commitments within their official statements. Moreover, Apple shareholders recently voted to uphold the company’s diversity efforts.
Public opinion on DEI remains divided. A survey by JUST Capital suggests that support for DEI has waned, but support for related issues—such as fair pay—remains strong. Similarly, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that a majority (56%) of employed adults still believe that workplace DEI efforts are beneficial.
